The main press has been very effective in keeping incontrovertible details about 9/11 away from the public and any election campaign issue at this time, based on 9/11, has to be thought out carefully, to ensure that its proponent is not urging the public to accept a concept as unbelievable as the moon being made of green cheese.
Thus, I am wording this issue carefully: To have an investigation by the NYS Attorney General into the causes of any damages suffered by residents, businesses, property owners and/or the government itself as a result of the 9/11 destruction of 7 WTC, and an identification of the persons responsible for such damages.
This would not be a trial in a court of law, but an investigation by the Office of the NYS Attorney General, which can be expected to produce better investigative results than the 9/11 Commission.
A main purpose would be to collect and preserve testimony while it is still available, and while 9/11 is not pushed aside by other matters. An independent investigation by the NYS Attorney General can be expected to arrive at a closer approximation of the truth than the 9/11 Commission with its known shortcomings.
Anyone interested in learning more about this subject could start by reading the material published at 911truth.org; Cooperativeresearch.org; and the two leading books on 9/11: 9/11 Synthetic Terror - Made in USA by Webster Griffin Tarpley, published by Progressive Press 2006; and The Big Wedding - 9/11, the Whistle-Blowers, & the Cover-Up by Sander Hicks, published by Vox Pop 2005.